I did my second open mic last night. It went well like my first one. I use new material each time (I have a lot to go through, because I keep writing all the time), and make plenty of mistakes (particularly in body language), and about 2/3 of my stuff hits.
Tell me if I'm wrong, but - there seems to be two schools of thought out there from the books I've read. One is to be authentic, write down whatever you want to communicate, and possibly tweak it a little to be funny. The other is to sit down with a list of topics and scientifically deconstruct them into funny pieces. Is that right or am I imagining it?
I seem to be doing the first. I have fairly long setups (30-60 seconds), and then the punches.
Which is very different to the other open mic'ers who are pretty much constant laughter generators. Their setups are much shorter, and they incorporate a lot more energy into their movements, etc, and seem more confident, not just on stage but backstage.
My personality and also character (as an exaggeration of myself) is pretty introvert. I don't really want to become like them, although of course I expect to become more confident over time. The most common comment I've gotten is that I'm professional and intellectual about my stand up.
I guess I'm just thinking out loud, but on the other hand I'm wondering if I am blinded and actually need to break out and start acting more like those other open mic'ers and grab hold of the audience in my next show. Or if I should just focus on fixing whatever body language I think is wrong in my last act and continue on my own path.
The other question I had is about picking a name. My first name is quite common in comedy it seems. My full name is hard to pronounce for MCs or spell for anyone who would want to look it up. Are there any suggestions on picking stage names?


Reply With Quote

