
Originally Posted by
pg13
Some people complain that my posts are too long. I'll try to keep these answers short...and always remember that your mileage (or opinions or experiences) may vary.
Mo Question #1: <i>Why is it bad for comics to make it too soon?</i>
<b>pg answer:</b> There are just somethings that you learn only by doing it a lot...techniques to handle a variety of circumstances, including but not limited to: You've had some success, how do you handle topping your best efforts? ...and... What do I do when people stop thinking of me as the hot new thing?
Mo Question #2: <i>What happens to those who seem to be making it quick?</i>
<b>pg answer:</b> They make some money, they get on tv, they make other comics who haven't achieved the same level of success frustrated. Beyond that, sometimes nothing bad happens...but other times a career flames out, a comedian's development can be stunted by too much success too soon.
I think the bigger point is: don't be so worked up about the opportunities that others get, and don't be too obsessed about where you are at this moment. Keep doing what you do and if what you do is good...chances are, someone will notice. Beyond that, it's out of your control and it's never going to be "fair."
Mo question #3: <i>When should you audition for Live at Gotham? 3 years? 6 years?</i>
<b>pg answer:</b> Considering the Gotham tv show began only 2+ years ago and there are some rumors I'm hearing about whether or not it'll continue in the future, I'm not sure there's an answer here.
I also hate to say this but, there's a certain amount of truth to the "if you wonder if you should audition, you're probably not ready" approach.
---
Dorset question #1: <i>What is a concise definition of comedic point of view?</i>
<b>pg answer:</b> Concise? What do I know about concise?
Point of view is self-explanatory--it is the definable and unique perspective by which the world is seen..."this is how I see it, from who I am and where I am". Think of the film technique with the same name: a POV angle is that would be seen by the character's eyes.
A comedic point of view describes the ability to demonstrate that unique and definable perspective through one's material and performance. (I've also heard of this described as a comedian's "throughline".)
Think of the classic contrasting definition between "jokes" (which anyone can tell) and "material" (which can only truly be told by the person whose persona matches the comedic point of view imbued into those thoughts and that performance.)
---
forgetiheardthat question #1: <i>Any help with set list construction, especially when it comes to a couple of blue jokes in a mostly clean set?</i>
<b>pg answer:</b> The classic advice of "end on a dick joke" has a certain amount of merit. So does "Start with your best joke, end on your second best joke."
A set opener has a specific job to do--it has to uncross the arms of an audience that needs proof that they should feel confident that you can make them laugh...while AT THE SAME TIME setting them up with enough information to get a sense of who you are and where you're coming from.
If your first joke is dirty, they'll probably expect you to be dirty throughout your set.
A set closer has a specific job to do--it has to allow you to leave the stage with a big enough laughs to make it clear that the time that audience just spent with you was clearly worth it...while leaving a lingering impression that should, hopefully, make people want to tell their friends about how funny you were and look forward to seeing you again.
If your last joke is dirty, they're more likely to remember you being dirty.
The 2007 Seattle International Comedy Competition had a competitor whose act was that of a likable, comfortable, African-American suburban dad...very Reginald VelJohnson-ish. He never got huge laughs in his set, but crowds generally liked him...until he'd do a closing bit that was almost always REALLY dirty. It wasn't the same closing bit--seemed he had a bag full of sloppy pussy-eating jokes. It just didn't work. His comedic point of view was clearly inconsistent--so, people didn't accept him...and he failed to get out of the preliminary round.
That said...there's certainly a way to make a comedic subversion of what you've created throughout your set in the last joke of that set--because the tension of having just basically "Punk'd" the audience is strong. It may, however, be a gag you can only do with an audience that has never seen you before and won't see you again. Something to weigh out.
Setlist construction is an imperfect art. One joke that works well might depend on empathy you've created when certain jokes precede it...and won't work at all if moved. Some performers don't like being tied to a setlist at all, feeling that they can surf the fickle waves of an audience better in the moment than any predetermined list. It can certainly save you needless obsession-based worry if you can break-away from depending on a rigid setlist early in your comedic pursuits.
(This said from someone who still slavishly writes out a setlist to this day...I know why I do it, but I definitely understand the opinions of those who suggest that I stop.)
pg--Answers? Maybe. Maybe not. Better said by Manic Street Preachers, "This is my truth, tell me yours."--seattle